Honda XL750 Transalp vs KTM 390 Adventure R
Two adventure bikes scored on the same 100-point system: specs side by side, points per category and a verdict that commits. These two sit in different classes, so each score is computed within its own class.
0 to 100 km/h
Estimated from power to weight, not a measured time.
0.00 s
Points by category
Six categories, 100 points. How every point is calculated
Engine and performance
out of 25Handling and chassis
out of 20Value
out of 20Practicality
out of 15Technology
out of 10Reliability and ownership
out of 10Specs side by side
| Spec | HondaXL750 Transalp | KTM390 Adventure R |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | Parallel twin, liquid cooled, Unicam | Single cylinder, liquid cooled, DOHC |
| Displacement | 755 cc | 398.7 cc |
| Power | 91.8 hp at 9,500 rpm | 45 hp at 8,500 rpm |
| Torque | 75 Nm at 7,250 rpm | 39 Nm at 7,000 rpm |
| Power to weight | 0.44 hp/kg | 0.26 hp/kg |
| Chassis | ||
| Wet weight | 208 kg | 176 kg |
| Front suspension | Showa 43 mm SFF-CA inverted, 200 mm | WP APEX 43 mm open cartridge, 230 mm |
| Front adjustability | Non-adjustable | Compression and rebound |
| Rear suspension | Showa Pro-Link monoshock, 190 mm | WP APEX monoshock, 230 mm |
| Rear adjustability | Preload only | Preload and rebound |
| Front brake | 310 mm, axial 2-piston | 320 mm, radial 4-piston |
| ABS | Switchable ABS | Cornering ABS |
| Dimensions | ||
| Seat height | 850 mm | 870 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1560 mm | 1481 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 16.9 L | 14 L |
| Claimed consumption | 4.4 L/100 km | 3.7 L/100 km |
| Fuel range | 384 km | 378 km |
| Ownership | ||
| Price | €11,040 | €7,999 |
| Service interval | 12,000 km | 10,000 km |
| Valve check | 24,000 km | 20,000 km |
| Warranty | 2 years | 2 years |
| Equipment | ||
| Dash | TFT | TFT |
| Ride modes | Yes | Yes |
| Traction control | Yes | Yes |
| Quickshifter | Optional | Optional |
| Cruise control | Not available | Not available |
| Connectivity | Yes | Yes |
Verdict
The Honda XL750 Transalp wins this comparison narrowly, 60.3 points to 59.2.
The gap of 1.1 points is built mostly in value, where the XL750 Transalp takes 5.3 points out of the 390 Adventure R. Scores are computed within each bike's class from published spec data; the full formula is on the methodology page.
On the road the XL750 Transalp is the quicker machine: 91.8 hp and 75 Nm moving 208 kg, against 45 hp and 39 Nm moving 176 kg for the 390 Adventure R. That is 0.44 hp per kilo playing 0.26.
The 390 Adventure R costs €7,999, which leaves €3,041 in your pocket against the XL750 Transalp at €11,040. Service intervals run 10,000 km on the 390 Adventure R and 12,000 km on the XL750 Transalp.
Better for city and commuting
Honda XL750 Transalp
A 850 mm seat, 384 km of tank range and the stronger practicality and value scores make it the easier bike to live with daily.
Better for weekend twisties
KTM 390 Adventure R
45 hp pushing 176 kg with WP APEX 43 mm open cartridge up front. It takes the combined engine and handling points.
Better for longer trips
Honda XL750 Transalp
384 km between fuel stops and the better equipment score. Distance rewards range and rider aids, and it has more of both.
Frequently asked
- Which is faster, the Honda XL750 Transalp or the KTM 390 Adventure R?
- The Honda XL750 Transalp. It carries 0.44 hp per kilo (91.8 hp, 208 kg wet) against 0.26 hp per kilo for the KTM 390 Adventure R (45 hp, 176 kg).
- Is the Honda XL750 Transalp cheaper than the KTM 390 Adventure R?
- The KTM 390 Adventure R is cheaper at €7,999 list, €3,041 less than the Honda XL750 Transalp at €11,040.
- Which is better for shorter riders?
- The Honda XL750 Transalp. Its 850 mm seat is 20 mm lower than the KTM 390 Adventure R, and at 208 kg it is the easier bike to manage at a stop.
- Which has better technology, the XL750 Transalp or the 390 Adventure R?
- The KTM 390 Adventure R, which scores 8.3 of 10 tech points with cornering ABS, a TFT dash, traction control and phone connectivity. The Honda XL750 Transalp counters with a TFT dash, traction control and phone connectivity.
- Which goes further on a tank?
- The Honda XL750 Transalp: 384 km from its 16.9 litre tank at the claimed consumption, against 378 km for the KTM 390 Adventure R.
- Which bike wins overall?
- The Honda XL750 Transalp, scoring 60.3 of 100 against 59.2 on our within-class points system. The full breakdown and formula are public on the methodology page.
Dig into each bike
More comparisons
Honda XL750 TransalpvsYamaha Tenere 700
91.8 hp vs 73 hp / 208 kg vs 208 kg
Honda XL750 TransalpvsKTM 890 Adventure R
91.8 hp vs 105 hp / 208 kg vs 215 kg
Honda XL750 TransalpvsRoyal Enfield Himalayan 450
91.8 hp vs 40 hp / 208 kg vs 196 kg
CFMOTO 450MTvsHonda XL750 Transalp
42 hp vs 91.8 hp / 175 kg vs 208 kg
CFMOTO 450MTvsKTM 390 Adventure R
42 hp vs 45 hp / 175 kg vs 176 kg
KTM 390 Adventure RvsRoyal Enfield Himalayan 450
45 hp vs 40 hp / 176 kg vs 196 kg