KTM 790 Duke vs Triumph Trident 660
Two naked bikes scored on the same 100-point system: specs side by side, points per category and a verdict that commits.
0 to 100 km/h
Estimated from power to weight, not a measured time.
0.00 s
Points by category
Six categories, 100 points. How every point is calculated
Engine and performance
out of 25Handling and chassis
out of 20Value
out of 20Practicality
out of 15Technology
out of 10Reliability and ownership
out of 10Specs side by side
| Spec | KTM790 Duke | TriumphTrident 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | LC8c parallel twin, liquid cooled, DOHC | Inline triple, liquid cooled, DOHC |
| Displacement | 799 cc | 660 cc |
| Power | 95 hp at 9,500 rpm | 81 hp at 10,250 rpm |
| Torque | 87 Nm at 8,000 rpm | 64 Nm at 6,250 rpm |
| Power to weight | 0.52 hp/kg | 0.43 hp/kg |
| Chassis | ||
| Wet weight | 184 kg | 190 kg |
| Front suspension | WP APEX 43 mm open cartridge, 140 mm | Showa 41 mm SFF-BP inverted, 120 mm |
| Front adjustability | Non-adjustable | Non-adjustable |
| Rear suspension | WP APEX monoshock, 150 mm | Showa monoshock, 133 mm |
| Rear adjustability | Preload only | Preload only |
| Front brake | 300 mm, radial 4-piston | 310 mm, axial 2-piston |
| ABS | Cornering ABS | Cornering ABS |
| Dimensions | ||
| Seat height | 825 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1475 mm | 1401 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 14 L | 14 L |
| Claimed consumption | 4.5 L/100 km | 4.7 L/100 km |
| Fuel range | 311 km | 298 km |
| Ownership | ||
| Price | €8,999 | €8,295 |
| Service interval | 15,000 km | 16,000 km |
| Valve check | 30,000 km | 32,000 km |
| Warranty | 2 years | 2 years |
| Equipment | ||
| Dash | TFT | TFT |
| Ride modes | Yes | Yes |
| Traction control | Yes | Yes |
| Quickshifter | Optional | Standard |
| Cruise control | Not available | Standard |
| Connectivity | Yes | Yes |
Verdict
The KTM 790 Duke wins this comparison clearly, 61.9 points to 54.6.
The gap of 7.3 points is built mostly in engine and performance, where the 790 Duke takes 14 points out of the Trident 660. Scores are computed within each bike's class from published spec data; the full formula is on the methodology page.
On the road the 790 Duke is the quicker machine: 95 hp and 87 Nm moving 184 kg, against 81 hp and 64 Nm moving 190 kg for the Trident 660. That is 0.52 hp per kilo playing 0.43.
The Trident 660 costs €8,295, which leaves €704 in your pocket against the 790 Duke at €8,999. Service intervals run 16,000 km on the Trident 660 and 15,000 km on the 790 Duke.
Better for city and commuting
Triumph Trident 660
A 805 mm seat, 298 km of tank range and the stronger practicality and value scores make it the easier bike to live with daily.
Better for weekend twisties
KTM 790 Duke
95 hp pushing 184 kg with WP APEX 43 mm open cartridge up front. It takes the combined engine and handling points.
Better for longer trips
Triumph Trident 660
298 km between fuel stops and the better equipment score. Distance rewards range and rider aids, and it has more of both.
Frequently asked
- Which is faster, the KTM 790 Duke or the Triumph Trident 660?
- The KTM 790 Duke. It carries 0.52 hp per kilo (95 hp, 184 kg wet) against 0.43 hp per kilo for the Triumph Trident 660 (81 hp, 190 kg).
- Is the KTM 790 Duke cheaper than the Triumph Trident 660?
- The Triumph Trident 660 is cheaper at €8,295 list, €704 less than the KTM 790 Duke at €8,999.
- Which is better for shorter riders?
- The Triumph Trident 660. Its 805 mm seat is 20 mm lower than the KTM 790 Duke, and at 190 kg it is the easier bike to manage at a stop.
- Which has better technology, the 790 Duke or the Trident 660?
- The Triumph Trident 660, which scores 10 of 10 tech points with cornering ABS, a TFT dash, traction control, a standard quickshifter, cruise control and phone connectivity. The KTM 790 Duke counters with cornering ABS, a TFT dash, traction control and phone connectivity.
- Which goes further on a tank?
- The KTM 790 Duke: 311 km from its 14 litre tank at the claimed consumption, against 298 km for the Triumph Trident 660.
- Which bike wins overall?
- The KTM 790 Duke, scoring 61.9 of 100 against 54.6 on our within-class points system. The full breakdown and formula are public on the methodology page.
Dig into each bike
More comparisons
KTM 790 DukevsSuzuki GSX-8S
95 hp vs 82.9 hp / 184 kg vs 202 kg
Honda CB750 HornetvsKTM 790 Duke
91.8 hp vs 95 hp / 190 kg vs 184 kg
KTM 790 DukevsYamaha MT-07
95 hp vs 73.4 hp / 184 kg vs 184 kg
KTM 790 DukevsYamaha MT-09
95 hp vs 119 hp / 184 kg vs 193 kg
Triumph Trident 660vsYamaha MT-07
81 hp vs 73.4 hp / 190 kg vs 184 kg
Honda CB750 HornetvsTriumph Trident 660
91.8 hp vs 81 hp / 190 kg vs 190 kg