The Moto Ref

KTM 390 SMC R vs Suzuki DR-Z4SM

Two supermoto bikes scored on the same 100-point system: specs side by side, points per category and a verdict that commits.

KTM

390 SMC R

68.3

/ 100

Winner

vs

Suzuki

DR-Z4SM

42.2

/ 100

Advertisement320 x 100

0 to 100 km/h

Estimated from power to weight, not a measured time.

KTM 390 SMC R0 km/h
390 SMC R
Suzuki DR-Z4SM0 km/h
DR-Z4SM

Points by category

Six categories, 100 points. How every point is calculated

Engine and performance

out of 25
390 SMC R
18.8
DR-Z4SM
6.3

Handling and chassis

out of 20
390 SMC R
10.3
DR-Z4SM
14.0

Value

out of 20
390 SMC R
15.0
DR-Z4SM
5.0

Practicality

out of 15
390 SMC R
9.8
DR-Z4SM
4.1

Technology

out of 10
390 SMC R
8.3
DR-Z4SM
4.9

Reliability and ownership

out of 10
390 SMC R
6.1
DR-Z4SM
7.9

Specs side by side

Full specification comparison: KTM 390 SMC R versus Suzuki DR-Z4SM
SpecKTM390 SMC RSuzukiDR-Z4SM
Engine
EngineSingle cylinder, liquid cooled, DOHCSingle cylinder, liquid cooled, DOHC
Displacement398.7 cc398 cc
Power45 hp at 8,500 rpm38 hp at 8,000 rpm
Torque39 Nm at 7,000 rpm37 Nm at 6,500 rpm
Power to weight0.28 hp/kg0.25 hp/kg
Chassis
Wet weight161 kg154 kg
Front suspensionWP APEX 43 mm open cartridge, 230 mmKYB 46 mm inverted, 250 mm
Front adjustabilityCompression and reboundFully adjustable
Rear suspensionWP APEX monoshock, 230 mmKYB monoshock, 250 mm
Rear adjustabilityPreload and reboundFully adjustable
Front brake320 mm, radial 4-piston310 mm, axial 2-piston
ABSCornering ABSSwitchable ABS
Dimensions
Seat height860 mm890 mm
Wheelbase1453 mm1465 mm
Fuel capacity9 L8.7 L
Claimed consumption3.6 L/100 km3.7 L/100 km
Fuel range250 km235 km
Ownership
Price€6,999€9,699
Service interval10,000 km6,000 km
Valve check20,000 km24,000 km
Warranty2 years2 years
Equipment
DashTFTLCD
Ride modesYesYes
Traction controlYesYes
QuickshifterOptionalNot available
Cruise controlNot availableNot available
ConnectivityYesNo
Advertisement336 x 280

Verdict

The KTM 390 SMC R wins this comparison comfortably, 68.3 points to 42.2.

The gap of 26.1 points is built mostly in engine and performance, where the 390 SMC R takes 12.5 points out of the DR-Z4SM. Scores are computed within each bike's class from published spec data; the full formula is on the methodology page.

On the road the 390 SMC R is the quicker machine: 45 hp and 39 Nm moving 161 kg, against 38 hp and 37 Nm moving 154 kg for the DR-Z4SM. That is 0.28 hp per kilo playing 0.25.

The 390 SMC R costs €6,999, which leaves €2,700 in your pocket against the DR-Z4SM at €9,699. Service intervals run 10,000 km on the 390 SMC R and 6,000 km on the DR-Z4SM.

Better for city and commuting

KTM 390 SMC R

A 860 mm seat, 250 km of tank range and the stronger practicality and value scores make it the easier bike to live with daily.

Better for weekend twisties

KTM 390 SMC R

45 hp pushing 161 kg with WP APEX 43 mm open cartridge up front. It takes the combined engine and handling points.

Better for longer trips

KTM 390 SMC R

250 km between fuel stops and the better equipment score. Distance rewards range and rider aids, and it has more of both.

Frequently asked

Which is faster, the KTM 390 SMC R or the Suzuki DR-Z4SM?
The KTM 390 SMC R. It carries 0.28 hp per kilo (45 hp, 161 kg wet) against 0.25 hp per kilo for the Suzuki DR-Z4SM (38 hp, 154 kg).
Is the KTM 390 SMC R cheaper than the Suzuki DR-Z4SM?
The KTM 390 SMC R is cheaper at €6,999 list, €2,700 less than the Suzuki DR-Z4SM at €9,699.
Which is better for shorter riders?
The KTM 390 SMC R. Its 860 mm seat is 30 mm lower than the Suzuki DR-Z4SM, and at 161 kg it is the easier bike to manage at a stop.
Which has better technology, the 390 SMC R or the DR-Z4SM?
The KTM 390 SMC R, which scores 8.3 of 10 tech points with cornering ABS, a TFT dash, traction control and phone connectivity. The Suzuki DR-Z4SM counters with traction control.
Which goes further on a tank?
The KTM 390 SMC R: 250 km from its 9 litre tank at the claimed consumption, against 235 km for the Suzuki DR-Z4SM.
Which bike wins overall?
The KTM 390 SMC R, scoring 68.3 of 100 against 42.2 on our within-class points system. The full breakdown and formula are public on the methodology page.

Dig into each bike

More comparisons