The Moto Ref

Fantic XMF 125 Performance vs KTM 125 SMC R

Two supermoto bikes scored on the same 100-point system: specs side by side, points per category and a verdict that commits.

Fantic XMF 125 Performance, 2025
KTM 125 SMC R, 2026

Fantic

XMF 125 Performance

52.1

/ 100

Winner

KTM

125 SMC R

45.9

/ 100

0 to 100 km/h

Estimated from power to weight, not a measured time.

0.00 s

Fantic XMF 125 Performance0 km/h- s
XMF 125 Performance
KTM 125 SMC R0 km/h- s
125 SMC R

The Ref Ring · 3.4 km · 9 corners

A straight line settles nothing.

The XMF 125 Performance won on points. Now the XMF 125 Performance and the 125 SMC R go flag to flag: braking zones, corner speed and drive off the hairpins, computed from the same specs as the scores.

Race the full lap

Points by category

Six categories, 100 points. How every point is calculated

Engine and performance

out of 25
XMF 125 Performance
17.4
125 SMC R
7.6

Handling and chassis

out of 20
XMF 125 Performance
12.4
125 SMC R
7.6

Value

out of 20
XMF 125 Performance
6.2
125 SMC R
8.2

Practicality

out of 15
XMF 125 Performance
7.7
125 SMC R
9.2

Technology

out of 10
XMF 125 Performance
2.4
125 SMC R
5.2

Reliability and ownership

out of 10
XMF 125 Performance
6.0
125 SMC R
8.1

Specs side by side

Full specification comparison: Fantic XMF 125 Performance versus KTM 125 SMC R
SpecFanticXMF 125 PerformanceKTM125 SMC R
Engine
EngineSingle cylinder, liquid cooled, SOHC with VVASingle cylinder, liquid cooled, SOHC
Displacement124.7 cc125 cc
Power15 hp at 9,500 rpm15 hp at 10,000 rpm
Torque11.8 Nm at 7,500 rpm11.5 Nm at 7,750 rpm
Power to weight0.12 hp/kg0.10 hp/kg
Chassis
Wet weight127 kg152 kg
Front suspensionFantic 41 mm USD fork, 240 mmWP APEX 43 mm open cartridge, 230 mm
Front adjustabilityNon-adjustableNon-adjustable
Rear suspensionFantic FRS monoshock, 220 mmWP APEX monoshock, 230 mm
Rear adjustabilityPreload onlyPreload only
Front brake320 mm, radial 4-piston320 mm, radial 4-piston
ABSSwitchable ABSSwitchable ABS
Dimensions
Seat height870 mm860 mm
Wheelbase1435 mm1453 mm
Fuel capacity7.5 L9 L
Claimed consumption1.8 L/100 km2.4 L/100 km
Fuel range417 km375 km
Ownership
Price€4,990€5,299
Service interval5,000 km10,000 km
Valve check10,000 km20,000 km
Warranty2 years2 years
Equipment
DashLCDTFT
Ride modesNoNo
Traction controlNoNo
QuickshifterNot availableOptional
Cruise controlNot availableNot available
ConnectivityNoYes

Verdict

The Fantic XMF 125 Performance wins this comparison clearly, 52.1 points to 45.9.

The gap of 6.2 points is built mostly in engine and performance, where the XMF 125 Performance takes 9.8 points out of the 125 SMC R. Scores are computed within each bike's class from published spec data; the full formula is on the methodology page.

On the road the XMF 125 Performance is the quicker machine: 15 hp and 11.8 Nm moving 127 kg, against 15 hp and 11.5 Nm moving 152 kg for the 125 SMC R. That is 0.12 hp per kilo playing 0.10.

The XMF 125 Performance costs €4,990, which leaves €309 in your pocket against the 125 SMC R at €5,299. Service intervals run 5,000 km on the XMF 125 Performance and 10,000 km on the 125 SMC R.

Better for city and commuting

KTM 125 SMC R

A 860 mm seat, 375 km of tank range and the stronger practicality and value scores make it the easier bike to live with daily.

Better for weekend twisties

Fantic XMF 125 Performance

15 hp pushing 127 kg with Fantic 41 mm USD fork up front. It takes the combined engine and handling points.

Better for longer trips

KTM 125 SMC R

375 km between fuel stops and the better equipment score. Distance rewards range and rider aids, and it has more of both.

Frequently asked

Which is faster, the Fantic XMF 125 Performance or the KTM 125 SMC R?
The Fantic XMF 125 Performance. It carries 0.12 hp per kilo (15 hp, 127 kg wet) against 0.10 hp per kilo for the KTM 125 SMC R (15 hp, 152 kg).
Is the Fantic XMF 125 Performance cheaper than the KTM 125 SMC R?
The Fantic XMF 125 Performance is cheaper at €4,990 list, €309 less than the KTM 125 SMC R at €5,299.
Which is better for shorter riders?
The KTM 125 SMC R. Its 860 mm seat is 10 mm lower than the Fantic XMF 125 Performance, and at 152 kg it is the easier bike to manage at a stop.
Which has better technology, the XMF 125 Performance or the 125 SMC R?
The KTM 125 SMC R, which scores 5.2 of 10 tech points with a TFT dash and phone connectivity. The Fantic XMF 125 Performance counters with a deliberately simple spec.
Which goes further on a tank?
The Fantic XMF 125 Performance: 417 km from its 7.5 litre tank at the claimed consumption, against 375 km for the KTM 125 SMC R.
Which bike wins overall?
The Fantic XMF 125 Performance, scoring 52.1 of 100 against 45.9 on our within-class points system. The full breakdown and formula are public on the methodology page.

Dig into each bike

More comparisons