Fantic XMF 125 Performance vs KTM 125 SMC R
Two supermoto bikes scored on the same 100-point system: specs side by side, points per category and a verdict that commits.


0 to 100 km/h
Estimated from power to weight, not a measured time.
0.00 s
The Ref Ring · 3.4 km · 9 corners
A straight line settles nothing.
The XMF 125 Performance won on points. Now the XMF 125 Performance and the 125 SMC R go flag to flag: braking zones, corner speed and drive off the hairpins, computed from the same specs as the scores.
Race the full lapPoints by category
Six categories, 100 points. How every point is calculated
Engine and performance
out of 25Handling and chassis
out of 20Value
out of 20Practicality
out of 15Technology
out of 10Reliability and ownership
out of 10Specs side by side
| Spec | FanticXMF 125 Performance | KTM125 SMC R |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | Single cylinder, liquid cooled, SOHC with VVA | Single cylinder, liquid cooled, SOHC |
| Displacement | 124.7 cc | 125 cc |
| Power | 15 hp at 9,500 rpm | 15 hp at 10,000 rpm |
| Torque | 11.8 Nm at 7,500 rpm | 11.5 Nm at 7,750 rpm |
| Power to weight | 0.12 hp/kg | 0.10 hp/kg |
| Chassis | ||
| Wet weight | 127 kg | 152 kg |
| Front suspension | Fantic 41 mm USD fork, 240 mm | WP APEX 43 mm open cartridge, 230 mm |
| Front adjustability | Non-adjustable | Non-adjustable |
| Rear suspension | Fantic FRS monoshock, 220 mm | WP APEX monoshock, 230 mm |
| Rear adjustability | Preload only | Preload only |
| Front brake | 320 mm, radial 4-piston | 320 mm, radial 4-piston |
| ABS | Switchable ABS | Switchable ABS |
| Dimensions | ||
| Seat height | 870 mm | 860 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1435 mm | 1453 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 7.5 L | 9 L |
| Claimed consumption | 1.8 L/100 km | 2.4 L/100 km |
| Fuel range | 417 km | 375 km |
| Ownership | ||
| Price | €4,990 | €5,299 |
| Service interval | 5,000 km | 10,000 km |
| Valve check | 10,000 km | 20,000 km |
| Warranty | 2 years | 2 years |
| Equipment | ||
| Dash | LCD | TFT |
| Ride modes | No | No |
| Traction control | No | No |
| Quickshifter | Not available | Optional |
| Cruise control | Not available | Not available |
| Connectivity | No | Yes |
Verdict
The Fantic XMF 125 Performance wins this comparison clearly, 52.1 points to 45.9.
The gap of 6.2 points is built mostly in engine and performance, where the XMF 125 Performance takes 9.8 points out of the 125 SMC R. Scores are computed within each bike's class from published spec data; the full formula is on the methodology page.
On the road the XMF 125 Performance is the quicker machine: 15 hp and 11.8 Nm moving 127 kg, against 15 hp and 11.5 Nm moving 152 kg for the 125 SMC R. That is 0.12 hp per kilo playing 0.10.
The XMF 125 Performance costs €4,990, which leaves €309 in your pocket against the 125 SMC R at €5,299. Service intervals run 5,000 km on the XMF 125 Performance and 10,000 km on the 125 SMC R.
Better for city and commuting
KTM 125 SMC R
A 860 mm seat, 375 km of tank range and the stronger practicality and value scores make it the easier bike to live with daily.
Better for weekend twisties
Fantic XMF 125 Performance
15 hp pushing 127 kg with Fantic 41 mm USD fork up front. It takes the combined engine and handling points.
Better for longer trips
KTM 125 SMC R
375 km between fuel stops and the better equipment score. Distance rewards range and rider aids, and it has more of both.
Frequently asked
- Which is faster, the Fantic XMF 125 Performance or the KTM 125 SMC R?
- The Fantic XMF 125 Performance. It carries 0.12 hp per kilo (15 hp, 127 kg wet) against 0.10 hp per kilo for the KTM 125 SMC R (15 hp, 152 kg).
- Is the Fantic XMF 125 Performance cheaper than the KTM 125 SMC R?
- The Fantic XMF 125 Performance is cheaper at €4,990 list, €309 less than the KTM 125 SMC R at €5,299.
- Which is better for shorter riders?
- The KTM 125 SMC R. Its 860 mm seat is 10 mm lower than the Fantic XMF 125 Performance, and at 152 kg it is the easier bike to manage at a stop.
- Which has better technology, the XMF 125 Performance or the 125 SMC R?
- The KTM 125 SMC R, which scores 5.2 of 10 tech points with a TFT dash and phone connectivity. The Fantic XMF 125 Performance counters with a deliberately simple spec.
- Which goes further on a tank?
- The Fantic XMF 125 Performance: 417 km from its 7.5 litre tank at the claimed consumption, against 375 km for the KTM 125 SMC R.
- Which bike wins overall?
- The Fantic XMF 125 Performance, scoring 52.1 of 100 against 45.9 on our within-class points system. The full breakdown and formula are public on the methodology page.
Dig into each bike
More comparisons
Aprilia SX 125 vs Fantic XMF 125 Performance
15 hp vs 15 hp / 136 kg vs 127 kg
Fantic XMF 125 Performance vs Suzuki DR-Z4SM
15 hp vs 38 hp / 127 kg vs 154 kg
Fantic XMF 125 Performance vs KTM 390 SMC R
15 hp vs 45 hp / 127 kg vs 161 kg
Ducati Hypermotard 698 Mono vs Fantic XMF 125 Performance
77.5 hp vs 15 hp / 161 kg vs 127 kg
Aprilia SX 125 vs KTM 125 SMC R
15 hp vs 15 hp / 136 kg vs 152 kg
KTM 125 SMC R vs Suzuki DR-Z4SM
15 hp vs 38 hp / 152 kg vs 154 kg