Fantic XMF 125 Performance vs Suzuki DR-Z4SM

Verdict

The Fantic XMF 125 Performance wins this comparison clearly, 52.1 points to 42.2.

The gap of 9.9 points is built mostly in engine and performance, where the XMF 125 Performance takes 11.1 points out of the DR-Z4SM. Scores are computed within each bike's class from published spec data; the full formula is on the methodology page.

On the road the DR-Z4SM is the quicker machine: 38 hp and 37 Nm moving 154 kg, against 15 hp and 11.8 Nm moving 127 kg for the XMF 125 Performance. That is 0.25 hp per kilo playing 0.12.

The XMF 125 Performance costs €4,990, which leaves €4,709 in your pocket against the DR-Z4SM at €9,699. Service intervals run 5,000 km on the XMF 125 Performance and 6,000 km on the DR-Z4SM.

Frequently asked

Which is faster, the Fantic XMF 125 Performance or the Suzuki DR-Z4SM?

The Suzuki DR-Z4SM. It carries 0.25 hp per kilo (38 hp, 154 kg wet) against 0.12 hp per kilo for the Fantic XMF 125 Performance (15 hp, 127 kg).

Is the Fantic XMF 125 Performance cheaper than the Suzuki DR-Z4SM?

The Fantic XMF 125 Performance is cheaper at €4,990 list, €4,709 less than the Suzuki DR-Z4SM at €9,699.

Which is better for shorter riders?

The Fantic XMF 125 Performance. Its 870 mm seat is 20 mm lower than the Suzuki DR-Z4SM, and at 127 kg it is the easier bike to manage at a stop.

Which has better technology, the XMF 125 Performance or the DR-Z4SM?

The Suzuki DR-Z4SM, which scores 4.9 of 10 tech points with traction control. The Fantic XMF 125 Performance counters with a deliberately simple spec.

Which goes further on a tank?

The Fantic XMF 125 Performance: 417 km from its 7.5 litre tank at the claimed consumption, against 235 km for the Suzuki DR-Z4SM.

Which bike wins overall?

The Fantic XMF 125 Performance, scoring 52.1 of 100 against 42.2 on our within-class points system. The full breakdown and formula are public on the methodology page.