The Moto Ref

Suzuki GSX-8S vs Yamaha MT-07

Two naked bikes scored on the same 100-point system: specs side by side, points per category and a verdict that commits.

Suzuki

GSX-8S

40.8

/ 100

vs

Yamaha

MT-07

54.8

/ 100

Winner

0 to 100 km/h

Estimated from power to weight, not a measured time.

0.00 s

Suzuki GSX-8S0 km/h- s
GSX-8S
Yamaha MT-070 km/h- s
MT-07

Points by category

Six categories, 100 points. How every point is calculated

Engine and performance

out of 25
GSX-8S
9.7
MT-07
4.3

Handling and chassis

out of 20
GSX-8S
6.7
MT-07
13.5

Value

out of 20
GSX-8S
2.9
MT-07
12.2

Practicality

out of 15
GSX-8S
8.9
MT-07
9.4

Technology

out of 10
GSX-8S
6.8
MT-07
7.1

Reliability and ownership

out of 10
GSX-8S
5.8
MT-07
8.3

Specs side by side

Full specification comparison: Suzuki GSX-8S versus Yamaha MT-07
SpecSuzukiGSX-8SYamahaMT-07
Engine
EngineParallel twin 270 degree, liquid cooled, DOHCCP2 parallel twin, liquid cooled, DOHC
Displacement776 cc689 cc
Power82.9 hp at 8,500 rpm73.4 hp at 8,750 rpm
Torque78 Nm at 6,800 rpm68 Nm at 6,500 rpm
Power to weight0.41 hp/kg0.40 hp/kg
Chassis
Wet weight202 kg184 kg
Front suspensionKYB 41 mm inverted, 130 mmKYB 41 mm inverted, 130 mm
Front adjustabilityNon-adjustablePreload only
Rear suspensionKYB monoshock, 130 mmKYB monoshock, 130 mm
Rear adjustabilityPreload onlyPreload and rebound
Front brake310 mm, radial 4-piston298 mm, radial 4-piston
ABSStandard ABSStandard ABS
Dimensions
Seat height810 mm805 mm
Wheelbase1465 mm1400 mm
Fuel capacity14 L14 L
Claimed consumption4.2 L/100 km4.2 L/100 km
Fuel range333 km333 km
Ownership
Price€8,990€8,199
Service interval6,000 km10,000 km
Valve check24,000 km42,000 km
Warranty2 years2 years
Equipment
DashTFTTFT
Ride modesYesYes
Traction controlYesYes
QuickshifterStandardOptional
Cruise controlNot availableNot available
ConnectivityNoYes

Verdict

The Yamaha MT-07 wins this comparison comfortably, 54.8 points to 40.8.

The gap of 14 points is built mostly in value, where the MT-07 takes 9.3 points out of the GSX-8S. Scores are computed within each bike's class from published spec data; the full formula is on the methodology page.

On the road the GSX-8S is the quicker machine: 82.9 hp and 78 Nm moving 202 kg, against 73.4 hp and 68 Nm moving 184 kg for the MT-07. That is 0.41 hp per kilo playing 0.40.

The MT-07 costs €8,199, which leaves €791 in your pocket against the GSX-8S at €8,990. Service intervals run 10,000 km on the MT-07 and 6,000 km on the GSX-8S.

Better for city and commuting

Yamaha MT-07

A 805 mm seat, 333 km of tank range and the stronger practicality and value scores make it the easier bike to live with daily.

Better for weekend twisties

Yamaha MT-07

73.4 hp pushing 184 kg with KYB 41 mm inverted up front. It takes the combined engine and handling points.

Better for longer trips

Yamaha MT-07

333 km between fuel stops and the better equipment score. Distance rewards range and rider aids, and it has more of both.

Frequently asked

Which is faster, the Suzuki GSX-8S or the Yamaha MT-07?
The Suzuki GSX-8S. It carries 0.41 hp per kilo (82.9 hp, 202 kg wet) against 0.40 hp per kilo for the Yamaha MT-07 (73.4 hp, 184 kg).
Is the Suzuki GSX-8S cheaper than the Yamaha MT-07?
The Yamaha MT-07 is cheaper at €8,199 list, €791 less than the Suzuki GSX-8S at €8,990.
Which is better for shorter riders?
The Yamaha MT-07. Its 805 mm seat is 5 mm lower than the Suzuki GSX-8S, and at 184 kg it is the easier bike to manage at a stop.
Which has better technology, the GSX-8S or the MT-07?
The Yamaha MT-07, which scores 7.1 of 10 tech points with a TFT dash, traction control and phone connectivity. The Suzuki GSX-8S counters with a TFT dash, traction control and a standard quickshifter.
Which goes further on a tank?
The Suzuki GSX-8S: 333 km from its 14 litre tank at the claimed consumption, against 333 km for the Yamaha MT-07.
Which bike wins overall?
The Yamaha MT-07, scoring 54.8 of 100 against 40.8 on our within-class points system. The full breakdown and formula are public on the methodology page.

Dig into each bike

More comparisons